CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST GONZALES
January 13th, 2011 | 
Author: CLASS ACTION SUIT AGAINST GONZALES, INC, SISTEMA INTERNACIONAL DE TRANSPORTE DE AUTOBUSES, INC., and GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Latest update: January 1, 2003 :
On December 18, 2002 a complaint initiating the contemplated adversary proceeding was filed in the Bankruptcy Court in Phoenix. The Plaintiffs now include not only the Plaintiffs in the original suit in the Federal Court in Los Angeles but, in addition, Edward Barajas, Jose Jimenez Jr., Jose Morales, Alfredo Nava, Teresa Nava, Felix Novoa, Brenda Porras, Ricardo Rodriguez, Francisco Zamora, all suing on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated. The class has been expanded to include all former employees of Golden State Transportation who were laid off at various times in August, 2002. The Defendants remain Gonzalez, Inc., Greyhound Lines, Inc., and Sistema Internacional de Transporte de Autobuses, Inc. Further information regarding the status of the case will appear on this website.
December 5, 2002 :
On November 12, 2002 the Law Offices of Bennett Rolfe filed an action in the United States District Court in Los Angeles on behalf of Jimmy Rice, Manuel Paz, Cesar Barrios, Manuel Reygosa and Simon Rosales and all others who like those persons were laid off from their jobs at Golden State Transportation in the greater Los Angeles area on August 29 or 30, 2002.
The action was based on an alleged violation of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, popularly known as the WARN act, which requires some employers to give 60 days notice of certain types of lay-offs and provides for recovery of up to 60 days pay in the absence of such notice.
The Defendants in the action are Gonzalez, Inc. and its parent companies Sistema Internacional de Transporte de Autobuses, Inc. and Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Shortly after the filing of the action it was learned that Gonzalez, Inc. had filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition in the Bankruptcy Court in Phoenix, Arizona. Accordingly, the case is to be heard in a so-called adversary proceeding to be filed against all the Defendants in the Bankruptcy Court in Phoenix.
On December 2, 2002, the nationally recognized New York law firm of Lankenau and Miller as cooperating counsel for the Maurice and Jane Sugar Law Center in Detroit agreed to associate with the Law Offices of Bennett Rolfe in pursuit of the WARN claim which was filed.
Further information regarding this matter will appear on this Website.
personal injury lawyers port charlotte – Farrow & Pulice is a personal injury law firm representing personal
injury & accident lawsuits in Port Charlotte, Bradenton, Sarasota, Englewood & Venice FL. Call us today for a free case consultation for slip & fall injuries, wrongful death & physical assaults
patent trademark attorney – Trademares is a law firm which deals in copyrights, trademarks, patents etc. We are a member of a reliable Intellectual Property legal network. Contact us for your queries based on intellectual and industrial property law.
DUI San Diego – The Law Offices of Ian Pancer work diligently to protect your rights if you are facing DUI charges and would like to speak with a San Diego DUI Attorney. The Law Office of Ian Pancer 444 West C St. Suite 410, San Diego, CA. 92101 (619) 955-6653.
DUI Lawyer in San Diego – The San Diego DUI Specialists offer affordable legal representation if you need a San Diego DUI Lawyer. The San Diego DUI Specialists 402 West Broadway, Ste 400 #4023, San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 330-5815.
Posted in Law